The Washington Post reports this morning that the office of the Vice President edited testimony on climate change before its submission–isn’t this illegal (or did those rules change while I was sleeping)?
Members of Vice President Cheney’s staff censored congressional testimony by a top federal official about health threats posed by global warming, a former Environmental Protection Agency official said yesterday.
In a letter to Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), former EPA deputy associate administrator Jason K. Burnett said an official from Cheney’s office ordered last October that six pages be edited out of the testimony of Julie L. Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Gerberding had planned to say that the “CDC considers climate change a serious public health concern.”
Boxer, who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said the administration sought the changes for fear that Gerberding’s testimony could trigger new controls under the Clean Air Act that would regulate greenhouse-gas emissions from burning fossil fuels. The White House has opposed mandatory limits and has insisted that voluntary measures and increased research are the best ways to address the issue.
Where is the NY Times on this? Does anyone have an opinion (or is angry) about this?

0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
Leave a Comment